This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The development of a collective quality system: challenges and lessons learned; a qualitative study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 28 September 2016
Accepted: 26 June 2017
Published: 21 July 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 Sep 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Nienke Buwalda|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kathleen Moreo|
|18 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Loredana Sasso|
|18 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Nienke Buwalda|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|18 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Nienke Buwalda|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|23 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|26 Jun 2017||Editorially accepted|
|21 Jul 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-017-0946-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.