Certainty and safe consequence responses provide additional information from multiple choice question assessments
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|30 Sep 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matt Sibbald|
|29 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Athanasios Tsalatsanis|
|28 Apr 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Valerie Dory|
|27 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yoon Soo Park|
|29 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Mike Tweed|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Valerie Dory|
|17 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marianna LaNoue|
|30 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Mike Tweed|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|30 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marianna LaNoue|
|18 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Mike Tweed|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|18 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|19 Jun 2017||Editorially accepted|
|28 Jun 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-017-0942-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.