Skip to content


BMC Medical Education

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

How changing quality management influenced PGME accreditation: a focus on decentralization and quality improvement

  • Nesibe Akdemir1Email author,
  • Kiki M. J. M. H. Lombarts2,
  • Emma Paternotte1,
  • Bas Schreuder3 and
  • Fedde Scheele1, 4, 5
BMC Medical EducationBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:98

Received: 23 November 2016

Accepted: 21 May 2017

Published: 2 June 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
23 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Trevor Austin
13 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jamiu O. Busari
17 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Nesibe Akdemir
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 May 2017 Editorially accepted
2 Jun 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-0937-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Medical Education, OLVG Teaching Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Professional Performance Research Group, Center for Evidence-Based Education, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Royal Dutch Medical Association, Specialist Physicians’ Registration Committee, Utrecht, The Netherlands
School of Medical Sciences, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Athena Institute for Transdisciplinary Research, VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands