Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Is the delivery of a quality improvement education programme in obstetrics and gynaecology for final year medical students feasible and still effective in a shortened time frame?

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Sep 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jane Runnacles
4 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne-Marie Bergh
7 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Bridget Kool
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jane Runnacles
3 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne-Marie Bergh
13 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Bridget Kool
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Bridget Kool
Resubmission - Version 4
4 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
10 May 2017 Editorially accepted
26 May 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-0927-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement