This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Is the delivery of a quality improvement education programme in obstetrics and gynaecology for final year medical students feasible and still effective in a shortened time frame?
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 27 September 2016
Accepted: 10 May 2017
Published: 26 May 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|27 Sep 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jane Runnacles|
|4 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anne-Marie Bergh|
|7 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Bridget Kool|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jane Runnacles|
|3 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anne-Marie Bergh|
|13 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Bridget Kool|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Bridget Kool|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|4 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|10 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|26 May 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-017-0927-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.