Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Different perceptions of narrative medicine between Western and Chinese medicine students

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Louella McCarthy
29 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Claire Hooker
19 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jimmie Leppink
22 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Chien-Da Huang
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Chien-Da Huang
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Chien-Da Huang
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
4 May 2017 Editorially accepted
10 May 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-0925-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement