Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Medical Education

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A preliminary investigation to explore the cognitive resources of physicians experiencing difficulty in training

  • Fiona Patterson1Email author,
  • Fran Cousans1, 2,
  • Iain Coyne3,
  • Jo Jones4,
  • Sheona Macleod4 and
  • Lara Zibarras1, 5
BMC Medical EducationBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:87

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0918-z

Received: 9 February 2016

Accepted: 26 April 2017

Published: 15 May 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Feb 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Manuel Joao Costa
5 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Charlotte Silen
10 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yoon Soo Park
12 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Fiona Patterson
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Fiona Patterson
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Fiona Patterson
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
26 Apr 2017 Editorially accepted
15 May 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-0918-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Work Psychology Group
(2)
Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behavoiur, University of Leicester
(3)
School of Business and Economics, Loughborough University
(4)
Health Education East Midlands
(5)
City, University of London

Advertisement