Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A preliminary investigation to explore the cognitive resources of physicians experiencing difficulty in training

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Feb 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Manuel Joao Costa
5 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Charlotte Silen
10 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yoon Soo Park
12 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Fiona Patterson
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Fiona Patterson
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Fiona Patterson
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
26 Apr 2017 Editorially accepted
15 May 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-0918-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement