Development of a written assessment for a national interprofessional cardiotocography education program
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 13 April 2016
Accepted: 26 April 2017
Published: 18 May 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|13 Apr 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 Apr 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Line Thellesen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Apr 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patricia Mullan|
|11 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Outi Palomäki|
|7 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Line Thellesen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Outi Palomäki|
|2 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Line Thellesen|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|2 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|26 Apr 2017||Editorially accepted|
|18 May 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-017-0915-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.