Skip to main content

Table 1 Development of main Ideas through participatory redesign phase and individual interviews

From: Changing the culture of assessment: the dominance of the summative assessment paradigm

  

Need for more authentic assessment

Provision of feedback without (or before) grades

Provision of one-to-one mentoring following assessments

Improved quality of feedback

Feedback regarding correct ‘model’ answers

Improved multi-source feedback by peers

Other

Individual post-it suggestions

Students

0

1

2

3

4

0

6

Clinicians

1

0

5

3

1

0

3

Pairs/trios

1

1

4

2

0

0

0

Sub-groups

1

1

2

2

0

0

0

Whole group

Discussed in detail. Largely supported in the group.

Discussed in some detail. Discussion led by two students. Clinicians implicitly critical.

Discussed in detail, but largely dismissed as logistically impractical.

Discussed very briefly – difficult to provide feedback when considering mark of borderline candidates.

Not discussed.

Brought up briefly by clinician near the end of the meeting

Not discussed

Individual follow-up interviews

Students

All discuss need for greater authenticity

One students remains strong advocate, others critical.

All supportive, while recognising practical constraints

Not discussed

 

Mixed views

 

Clinicians

¾ discuss need for greater authenticity

All are critical

One clinician supportive, others critical

Not discussed

 

Mixed views

 
  1. Numbers refer to the number of individuals or groups who raised a particular topic. Note that individuals completed more than one post-it per person