Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Medical students’ experience of emotions and success in neurological studies – What do they tell us?

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 May 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Jun 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nicky Hudson
18 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lara Hazelton
16 Aug 2016 Author responded Author comments - Hanna Ansakorpi
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Aug 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lara Hazelton
13 Oct 2016 Author responded Author comments - Hanna Ansakorpi
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Oct 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lara Hazelton
9 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Hanna Ansakorpi
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hanna Ansakorpi
Resubmission - Version 5
23 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
14 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hanna Ansakorpi
Resubmission - Version 6
14 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
22 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hanna Ansakorpi
Resubmission - Version 7
22 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
25 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
4 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-0905-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement