Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The development and validation of the clinicians’ awareness towards cognitive errors (CATChES) in clinical decision making questionnaire tool

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Feb 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eva Doherty
1 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Athanasios Tsalatsanis
12 Aug 2016 Author responded Author comments - Keng Sheng Chew
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Aug 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Athanasios Tsalatsanis
29 Oct 2016 Author responded Author comments - Keng Sheng Chew
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Oct 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Keng Sheng Chew
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
9 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
21 Mar 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-0897-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement