This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The development and validation of the clinicians’ awareness towards cognitive errors (CATChES) in clinical decision making questionnaire tool
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 29 February 2016
Accepted: 9 March 2017
Published: 21 March 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|29 Feb 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 Apr 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eva Doherty|
|1 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Athanasios Tsalatsanis|
|12 Aug 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Keng Sheng Chew|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|12 Aug 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Athanasios Tsalatsanis|
|29 Oct 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Keng Sheng Chew|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Oct 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Keng Sheng Chew|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|9 Mar 2017||Editorially accepted|
|21 Mar 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-017-0897-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.