Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Analysis of psychometric properties of the modified SETQ tool in undergraduate medical education

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Mar 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Olwyn Westwood
30 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan Breckwoldt
17 May 2016 Author responded Author comments - Ahmed Al Ansari
Resubmission - Version 2
17 May 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan Breckwoldt
20 Jul 2016 Author responded Author comments - Ahmed Al Ansari
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Jul 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan Breckwoldt
30 Aug 2016 Author responded Author comments - Ahmed Al Ansari
Resubmission - Version 4
30 Aug 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
22 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan Breckwoldt
14 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Ahmed Al Ansari
Resubmission - Version 5
14 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
16 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Ahmed Al Ansari
Resubmission - Version 6
16 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
22 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Ahmed Al Ansari
Resubmission - Version 7
22 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
8 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
16 Mar 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-0893-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement