Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Relating professionalism and conscientiousness to develop an objective, scalar, proxy measure of professionalism in anaesthetic trainees

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Sep 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christine Jorm
7 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Musick
14 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Marina Sawdon
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Marina Sawdon
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Marina Sawdon
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Marina Sawdon
Resubmission - Version 5
23 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
13 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Marina Sawdon
Resubmission - Version 6
13 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
15 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Marina Sawdon
Resubmission - Version 7
15 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 7
16 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Marina Sawdon
Resubmission - Version 8
16 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
22 Feb 2017 Editorially accepted
1 Mar 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-0891-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement