Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Medical Education

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Institutional factors affecting participation in national faculty development programs: a nation-wide investigation of medical schools

BMC Medical EducationBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:48

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0888-1

Received: 4 October 2016

Accepted: 20 February 2017

Published: 28 February 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Oct 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sandy Cook
27 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Iman Basheti
28 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lara Hazelton
23 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Do-Hwan Kim
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
20 Feb 2017 Editorially accepted
28 Feb 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-0888-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical Education, Seoul National University College of Medicine
(2)
Department of Educational Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin

Advertisement