Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Discrepancies between perceptions of students and deans regarding the consequences of restricting students’ use of electronic medical records on quality of medical education

BMC Medical EducationBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:55

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0887-2

Received: 13 September 2016

Accepted: 17 February 2017

Published: 13 March 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Sep 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sarah Shepherd
1 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carolyn King
14 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Ivan Solarte
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Ivan Solarte
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
17 Feb 2017 Editorially accepted
13 Mar 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-0887-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana School of Medicine, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio
(2)
Department of Educational Development & Research and Graduate School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University

Advertisement