This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Medical students’ experiences of their own professional development during three clinical terms: a prospective follow-up study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 14 August 2016
Accepted: 17 February 2017
Published: 27 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Aug 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bernadette Watson|
|20 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sarah Shepherd|
|21 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Susanne Kalén|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Susanne Kalén|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Susanne Kalén|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|29 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|17 Feb 2017||Editorially accepted|
|27 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-017-0886-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.