Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Medical students’ experiences of their own professional development during three clinical terms: a prospective follow-up study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bernadette Watson
20 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sarah Shepherd
21 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Susanne Kalén
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Susanne Kalén
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Susanne Kalén
Resubmission - Version 4
29 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
17 Feb 2017 Editorially accepted
27 Feb 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12909-017-0886-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement