From: Building capacity in Clinical Epidemiology in Africa: experiences from Masters programmes
N (%) | Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Strongly agree |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Application procedure | |||||
 The application procedures were clear |  |  | 3 (9.0) | 15 (45.5) | 15 (45.5) |
 The application process was easy to follow |  |  | 3 (9.0) | 15 (45.5) | 15 (45.5) |
Structured modules | |||||
 There was a variety of modules |  |  | 1 (3.0) | 14 (42.4) | 18 (54.6) |
 Duration of the modules was adequate |  | 2 (6.1) | 1 (3.0) | 19 (57.6) | 11 (33.3) |
 Assessments were fair |  | 1 (3.0) | 3 (9.1) | 16 (48.5) | 13 (39.4) |
Research project | |||||
 Guidelines were clear |  |  | 4 (12.1) | 13 (39.4) | 16 (48.5) |
 Support from supervisor was adequate | 1 (3.0) | 2 (6.1) | 1 (3.0) | 10 (30.3) | 19 (57.6) |
General | |||||
 Doing the MSc in Clinical Epidemiology influenced my career path |  | 1 (3.0) | 4 (12.1) | 9 (27.3) | 19 (57.6) |