This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Building capacity in Clinical Epidemiology in Africa: experiences from Masters programmes
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 7 April 2016
Accepted: 16 February 2017
Published: 27 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|7 Apr 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|4 Jun 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniel Amoako-Sakyi|
|9 Jun 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Molly Polverento|
|17 Jun 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Somashekhar Nimbalkar|
|28 Jun 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alison Cowley|
|8 Aug 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Taryn Young|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Aug 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Oct 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Taryn Young|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Oct 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|11 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Molly Polverento|
|16 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alison Cowley|
|15 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Taryn Young|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|15 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|16 Feb 2017||Editorially accepted|
|27 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-017-0885-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.