Table 3 Students’ feedback on the teaching model
Items | Score (Mean ± standard error) | Percentage of responding ≥4 (n,%) |
|---|---|---|
1. Your attitude to the traditional ECG teaching mode | 4.16 ± 0.89 | 68 (75.56%) |
2. Your attitude to the micro-video lessons + flipped classroom | 4.07 ± 0.96 | 61 (67.78%) |
3. The flipped classroom stimulated interest in learning | 4.01 ± 1.04 | 58 (64.44%) |
4. The flipped classroom was helpful in my self-directed learning | 4.1 ± 1.03 | 65 (72.22%) |
5. I can watch or selectively watch the micro-video lessons according to my own situation any time | 4.24 ± 0.92 | 72 (80.00%) |
6. The flipped classroom was helpful in mastery of knowledge | 4.09 ± 0.89 | 64 (71.11%) |
7. I benefited from watching micro-video lessons before class | 4.22 ± 0.93 | 71 (78.89%) |
8. I benefited from the teacher's lecture on key points | 4.43 ± 0.81 | 77 (85.56%) |
9. I benefited from class discussion with peers | 4.2 ± 0.99 | 68 (75.56%) |
10. I benefited from the question and answer sessions by teachers in the flipped classroom | 4.43 ± 0.78 | 76 (84.44%) |
11. I benefited from watching micro-video lessons for some key pointsafter class | 4.3 ± 0.89 | 71 (78.89%) |
12. The flipped classroom brought an increase in workload | 3.9 ± 1.03 | 52 (57.78%) |
13. The delivery of knowledge in a flipped classroom is fragmented and unsystematic | 3.88 ± 1.04 | 54 (60.00%) |
14. The flipped classroom is an effective teaching model that is worthy of promotion. | 4.17 ± 1.07 | 65 (72.22%) |