Predicting medical students who will have difficulty during their clinical training
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 28 April 2016
Accepted: 31 January 2017
Published: 21 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 Apr 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Jun 2016||Author responded||Author comments - David Jardine|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Jun 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Diann S Eley|
|6 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dason Evans|
|1 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - David Jardine|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|1 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 Jan 2017||Editorially accepted|
|21 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-017-0879-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.