Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Table 1 Structure of the EBP2Q with the separate domains and contained statementsa

From: Validation study of the Polish version of the Evidence-Based Practice Profile Questionnaire

Domain Item numbers Description
I. Relevance 1–14 (14 items) Attitude towards expanding own competence in the Evidence-Based Practice, expressed on a scale from 1 to 5 (1 – not at all true; 5 – very true)
II. Sympathy 15–21 (7 items) Attitude towards selected aspects of the Evidence-Based Practice in work, assessed by respondents on a scale from 1 to 5 (1 – strongly disagree; 5 – strongly agree)
III. Terminology 22–38 (17 items) The level of knowledge about the terminology related to scientific research; given terms and issues were rated on a scale from 1 to 5 (1 – never heard the term; 5 – understand and could explain to others)
IV. Practice 39–47 (9 items) Frequency of use of individual elements of Evidence-Based Practice in daily clinical work, assessed on a scale from 1 to 5 (1 – never; 5 – daily)
V. Confidence 48–58 (11 items) Confidence in skills related to Evidence-Based Practice rated on a scale from 1 to 5 (1 – not at all confident; 5 – very confident)
VI. Non-domain items 59–74 (16 items) Other aspects of Evidence-Based Practice, expressed on a scale from 1 to 5 (1 – strongly disagree; 5 – strongly agree)
VII. Demographics ----- Selected sociodemographic variables
  1. aall items based on a five-point Likert scale
  2. The original English version of the EBP2Q is available at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/supplementary/1472-6920-11-100-s1.pdf