Skip to main content

Table 4 Pearson correlations of IMI subscales, AMS subscales and student-reported competence. Correlations were considered ‘strong positive’ for r = 0.7 to 0.9, and ‘moderate positive’ for r = 0.4 to 0.6

From: Motivation and competence of participants in a learner-centered student-run clinic: an exploratory pilot study

Pearson Correlations - Motivation and perceived improvement in competences
   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1. IMI - Interest 29 -             
2. IMI - Usefulness 29 0.724 b -            
3. IMI - Perceived choice 29 0.222 0.438 a -           
4. AMS Intrinsic motivation 27 0.350 0.420 a 0.518 b -          
5. AMS Controlled motivation 27 0.102 0.197 −0.009 0.053 -         
6. AMS Autonomous motivation 27 0.379 0.461 a 0.534 b 0.951 b 0.250 -        
7. CANM Medical expert 29 0.522 b 0.601 b 0.329 0.226 0.134 0.261 -       
8. CANM Communicator 29 0.361 0.509 b 0.285 0.167 0.098 0.117 0.612 b -      
9. CANM Collaborator 29 0.355 0.362 0.215 0.076 0.198 0.083 0.551 b 0.713 b -     
10. CANM Academic 29 0.656 b 0.672 b 0.280 0.445 a 0.195 0.474 a 0.590 b 0.642 b 0.586 b -    
11. CANM Professional 29 0.364 0.401 a −0.021 0.358 0.118 0.309 0.383 a 0.433 a 0.256 0.546 b -   
12. CANM Manager 29 0.333 0.514 b 0.060 0.298 0.287 0.291 0.429 a 0.319 0.189 0.603 b 0.576 b -  
13. CANM Health advocate 29 0.200 0.436 a 0.425 a 0.186 0.236 0.271 0.456 a 0.189 0.147 0.384 a 0.318 0.380 a -
  1. Statistical significant correlations are indicated in bold
  2. a Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)
  3. b Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)