Table 4 Pearson correlations of IMI subscales, AMS subscales and student-reported competence. Correlations were considered ‘strong positive’ for r = 0.7 to 0.9, and ‘moderate positive’ for r = 0.4 to 0.6

1. IMI - Interest

29

-

2. IMI - Usefulness

29

0.724 ^b

-

3. IMI - Perceived choice

29

0.222

0.438 ^a

-

4. AMS Intrinsic motivation

27

0.350

0.420 ^a

0.518 ^b

-

5. AMS Controlled motivation

27

0.102

0.197

−0.009

0.053

-

6. AMS Autonomous motivation

27

0.379

0.461 ^a

0.534 ^b

0.951 ^b

0.250

-

7. CANM Medical expert

29

0.522 ^b

0.601 ^b

0.329

0.226

0.134

0.261

-

8. CANM Communicator

29

0.361

0.509 ^b

0.285

0.167

0.098

0.117

0.612 ^b

-

9. CANM Collaborator

29

0.355

0.362

0.215

0.076

0.198

0.083

0.551 ^b

0.713 ^b

-

10. CANM Academic

29

0.656 ^b

0.672 ^b

0.280

0.445 ^a

0.195

0.474 ^a

0.590 ^b

0.642 ^b

0.586 ^b

-

11. CANM Professional

29

0.364

0.401 ^a

−0.021

0.358

0.118

0.309

0.383 ^a

0.433 ^a

0.256

0.546 ^b

-

12. CANM Manager

29

0.333

0.514 ^b

0.060

0.298

0.287

0.291

0.429 ^a

0.319

0.189

0.603 ^b

0.576 ^b

-

13. CANM Health advocate

29

0.200

0.436 ^a

0.425 ^a

0.186

0.236

0.271

0.456 ^a

0.189

0.147

0.384 ^a

0.318

0.380 ^a

-