This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Validity evidence for two objective structured clinical examination stations to evaluate core skills of the shoulder and knee assessment
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 22 January 2016
Accepted: 20 December 2016
Published: 13 January 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|22 Jan 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|12 Feb 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Michael Battistone|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|12 Feb 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Jul 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sandra Carr|
|30 Jul 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Zarrin Siddiqui|
|13 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Denise Bee|
|6 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Michael Battistone|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Dec 2016||Editorially accepted|
|13 Jan 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-016-0850-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.