|
1.Less risk of cancellation due to heavy patient load
|
xx
|
xx
|
x
| |
|
2.Reported to promote better involvement of all postgraduate healthcare professionals
| |
x
|
x
|
x
|
|
3.No risk of staff being called away for clinical work
|
xx
|
x
| | |
|
4.Does not require travel time; accessibility for staff easier
| |
xx
|
xx
|
xx
|
|
5.Popular and promotes recruitment of postgraduate healthcare professionals
| | |
x
|
x
|
|
6.Not described as anxiety provoking
|
x
|
x
|
x
| |
|
7.May potentially give a greater feeling of safety psychologically
|
x
| | | |
|
8.Enhances individual learning
|
x
|
x
|
x
|
x
|
|
9.Enhances team learning
|
x
|
xx
|
xx
|
xx
|
|
10.More time potentially set aside, especially for debriefing
|
xx
|
x
|
x
| |
|
11.Ideas for organisational changes brought back to the organisation (latent patient safety issues)
| |
x
|
xx
|
xx
|
|
12.No potential risk of safety hazards due to mixing up medical equipment and utensils
|
xx
|
x
| | |
|
13.No potential risk of unintentional involvement of patients and relatives
|
xx
|
xx
|
x
| |
|
14.More efficient use of simulation equipment, which can be shared by many departments, and better facilities to ensure efficient use of high-tech simulation equipment
|
xx
| | | |
|
15.Potentially more efficient simulations due to development of simulation curriculum
|
xx
|
x
|
x
|
x
|
|
16.Easier access for technicians if simulation equipment has technical problems
|
xx
| | | |
|
17.Team-based and low-tech simulation can be cheaper due to use of local facilities and equipment
| |
x
|
xx
|
xx
|
|
18.Potentially more efficient simulations due to better training of simulation instructors
|
xx
|
x
|
x
|
x
|
