This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Design of simulation-based medical education and advantages and disadvantages of in situ simulation versus off-site simulation
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 18 June 2016
Accepted: 5 December 2016
Published: 21 January 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|18 Jun 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Helena Ward|
|24 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Samuel Edelbring|
|25 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Jette Led Sørensen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|25 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Jette Led Sørensen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Dec 2016||Editorially accepted|
|21 Jan 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-016-0838-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.