This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Comparative effectiveness of a serious game and an e-module to support patient safety knowledge and awareness
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 13 July 2016
Accepted: 1 December 2016
Published: 2 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|13 Jul 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniel Tolks|
|26 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Leandro Diehl|
|1 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Mary Dankbaar|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|1 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Leandro Diehl|
|7 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniel Tolks|
|16 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Mary Dankbaar|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Dec 2016||Editorially accepted|
|2 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-016-0836-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.