Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality of the feedback perceived by the students (n = 348 questionnaires, 79 “video based” and 269 “direct observation” feedback sessions)

From: The quality of feedback during formative OSCEs depends on the tutors’ profile

Quality of the feedback perceived by the students

All Tutors

Generalists

Specialists

  

n = 38

n = 22

n = 16

  

(Likert 1: completely disagree-5: completely agree)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

p

Adjusted p*

The feedback session was useful

4.73 (0.57)

4.78 (0.49)

4.63 (0.60)

0.034

0.164

I improved my history taking skills

4.35 (0.84)

4.38 (0.79)

4.26 (0.88)

0.250

0.435

I improved my physical examination skills

4.26 (0.94)

4.30 (0.92)

4.12 (1.00)

0.162

0.306

I improved my communication skills

4.20 (0.93)

4.26 (0.87)

3.97 (1.10)

0.102

0.051

The tutor was aware of what I needed to learn

4.74 (0.58)

4.80 (0.48)

4.59 (0.72)

0.003

0.010

The tutor made me feel comfortable and confident

4.65 (0.72)

4.72 (0.61)

4.48 (0.83)

0.006

0.024

The tutor asked me my learning needs

3.56 (1.63)

3.81 (1.54)

2.75 (1.62)

<0.001

0.013

The tutor asked me to evaluate what I did well

4.51 (0.90)

4.59 (0.77)

4.30 (1.10)

0.014

0.096

The tutor asked me to evaluate what I could improve

4.74 (0.62)

4.83 (0.47)

4.56 (0.82)

0.001

0.005

The tutor gave me balanced feedback (including both positive and less positive aspects)

4.71 (0.64)

4.80 (0.47)

4.57 (0.85)

0.006

0.030

The tutor stimulated me to participate to the problem solving process

3.95 (1.24)

4.14 (1.13)

3.43 (1.36)

<0.001

0.001

The tutor gave me precise and concrete suggestions for improvement

4.47 (0.92)

4.53 (0.84)

4.30 (1.08)

0.065

0.128

The tutor provided me opportunities to practice parts of the history taking, physical exam or the communication

2.73 (1.62)

2.84 (1.60)

2.32 (1.63)

0.015

0.184

The tutor asked the simulated patient to give me a feedback

4.42 (1.29)

4.58 (1.11)

4.04 (1.57)

0.002

0.159

The tutor checked my understanding

3.23 (1.61)

3.49 (1592)

2.52 (1.48)

<0.001

0.001

  1. *Using a model taking into account the type of OSCE (fixed effect), and the supervisor (random effect)