From: Global health education in Germany: an analysis of current capacity, needs and barriers
Priority setting of GH and GHE at decision-making level |
□ Advocacy at universities, federal and state bodies (e.g. ministries of education) (n = 15, 28%) □ Students as active parts in the advocacy work for more GHE (n = 3, 5%) □ Increasing public awareness of GH issues (n = 2, 4%) □ Consensus on a definition of GH (n = 1, 2%) |
Funding |
□ Increased funding for current GH courses by federal and state level (n = 6, 11%), □ Incentives for universities to invest in GHE through competitive funding mechanisms (n = 2, 4%) □ Investment into new curricula at medical schools including GHE (n = 1, 2%) |
Stronger cooperation and collaboration in the provision of GHE |
□ Stronger cross-faculty collaboration for interdisciplinary GHE (5%, n = 3) □ More collaboration between GH(E) experts in Germany (4%, n = 2) □ More collaboration of academia with (international) organizations/scientific institutes operating in the field of GH (e.g. NGOs, bi- and multilateral agencies to ensure professional expertise in GHE programs) (2%, n = 1) |
Career prospects |
□ Create new university career options for internationally practicing professionals who have not necessarily pursued an academic career before (5%, n = 3) □ Transparency on career options for GH graduates (e.g. career fairs, academia establishes contacts with international organizations and institutions) (4%, n = 2) |