Skip to main content

Table 3 Exam results according to type of intervention and gender (Between subject factors - Univariate ANOVAs)

From: Peyton’s four-step approach for teaching complex spinal manipulation techniques – a prospective randomized trial

  Peyton Group Control Group Between Subject Factor Intervention Between Subject Factor Gender
Women Men Women Men F(1,83) p F(1,83) p
OSPE total score 57 ± 12.3 61.9 ± 12.4 54.7 ± 13.7 45.2 ± 20.3 8.9 0.004* 0.5 0.5
OSPE diagnostic part 22.5 ± 7.1 24.8 ± 5.6 24.3 ± 8.4 21.1 ± 9.5 0.3 0.6 0.1 0.8
OSPE therapeutic part 34.5 ± 8.1 36.6 ± 9.8 30.4 ± 8.1 24.1 ± 11.7 16.4 <0.001* 1.1 0.3
Cervical spine Diagnosis 5.5 ± 1.4 5.9 ± 1.6 5.8 ± 1.9 6.2 ± 1.9 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.3
Cervical spine Therapy 5.4 ± 4.1 6.3 ± 4.2 5.4 ± 2.9 4.7 ± 3.6 0.7 0.4 0.02 0.9
Thoracic spine Diagnosis 5.1 ± 1.6 5.8 ± 1.2 5.5 ± 1.6 5.2 ± 2.1 0.1 0.8 0.4 0.5
Thoracic spine Therapy 8.6 ± 2.3 9.8 ± 2.1 8.2 ± 2.4 7.2 ± 3.3 7.4 0.008* 0.02 0.9
Lumbar spine Diagnosis 3 ± 2.4 4.3 ± 2 3.4 ± 2.7 3.3 ± 2.7 0.3 0.6 1.2 0.3
Lumbar spine Therapy 10.3 ± 3.7 10.7 ± 3.9 8.7 ± 3.4 6.6 ± 4.9 11.3 0.001* 0.9 0.3
Sacroiliac joint Diagnosis 8.9 ± 3.9 8.9 ± 3.4 9.6 ± 4.4 6.4 ± 4.4 0.9 0.3 3.1 0.08
Sacroiliac joint Therapy 10.2 ± 1.5 9.8 ± 3.1 8.2 ± 2.7 5.6 ± 4.5 24.8 <0.001* 5.3 0.02*
Multiple choice exam 6.8 ± 1.6 7.4 ± 1.5 6.8 ± 2.1 5.9 ± 1.8 3.7 0.06 0.2 0.7
  1. Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation, *indicating significance