Skip to main content

Table 3 Exam results according to type of intervention and gender (Between subject factors - Univariate ANOVAs)

From: Peyton’s four-step approach for teaching complex spinal manipulation techniques – a prospective randomized trial

 

Peyton Group

Control Group

Between Subject Factor Intervention

Between Subject Factor Gender

Women

Men

Women

Men

F(1,83)

p

F(1,83)

p

OSPE total score

57 ± 12.3

61.9 ± 12.4

54.7 ± 13.7

45.2 ± 20.3

8.9

0.004*

0.5

0.5

OSPE diagnostic part

22.5 ± 7.1

24.8 ± 5.6

24.3 ± 8.4

21.1 ± 9.5

0.3

0.6

0.1

0.8

OSPE therapeutic part

34.5 ± 8.1

36.6 ± 9.8

30.4 ± 8.1

24.1 ± 11.7

16.4

<0.001*

1.1

0.3

Cervical spine Diagnosis

5.5 ± 1.4

5.9 ± 1.6

5.8 ± 1.9

6.2 ± 1.9

0.6

0.5

0.9

0.3

Cervical spine Therapy

5.4 ± 4.1

6.3 ± 4.2

5.4 ± 2.9

4.7 ± 3.6

0.7

0.4

0.02

0.9

Thoracic spine Diagnosis

5.1 ± 1.6

5.8 ± 1.2

5.5 ± 1.6

5.2 ± 2.1

0.1

0.8

0.4

0.5

Thoracic spine Therapy

8.6 ± 2.3

9.8 ± 2.1

8.2 ± 2.4

7.2 ± 3.3

7.4

0.008*

0.02

0.9

Lumbar spine Diagnosis

3 ± 2.4

4.3 ± 2

3.4 ± 2.7

3.3 ± 2.7

0.3

0.6

1.2

0.3

Lumbar spine Therapy

10.3 ± 3.7

10.7 ± 3.9

8.7 ± 3.4

6.6 ± 4.9

11.3

0.001*

0.9

0.3

Sacroiliac joint Diagnosis

8.9 ± 3.9

8.9 ± 3.4

9.6 ± 4.4

6.4 ± 4.4

0.9

0.3

3.1

0.08

Sacroiliac joint Therapy

10.2 ± 1.5

9.8 ± 3.1

8.2 ± 2.7

5.6 ± 4.5

24.8

<0.001*

5.3

0.02*

Multiple choice exam

6.8 ± 1.6

7.4 ± 1.5

6.8 ± 2.1

5.9 ± 1.8

3.7

0.06

0.2

0.7

  1. Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation, *indicating significance