Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The impact of item-writing flaws and item complexity on examination item difficulty and discrimination value

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Dec 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marie Tarrant
7 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Edward Palmer
26 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Syeda Ali
28 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michaela Wagner-Menghin
18 Jun 2016 Author responded Author comments - Bonnie Rush
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Jun 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Jun 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Edward Palmer
4 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marie Tarrant
11 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Syeda Ali
21 Aug 2016 Author responded Author comments - Bonnie Rush
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Aug 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Aug 2016 Author responded Author comments - Bonnie Rush
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Aug 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
13 Sep 2016 Author responded Author comments - Bonnie Rush
Resubmission - Version 5
13 Sep 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
20 Sep 2016 Editorially accepted
29 Sep 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12909-016-0773-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement