Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Schwartz Centre Rounds: a new initiative in the undergraduate curriculum—what do medical students think?

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Dec 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Jan 2016 Author responded Author comments - Faye Gishen
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Jan 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Mclachlan
28 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sandy Cook
5 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph F. O'Donnell
20 Jun 2016 Author responded Author comments - Faye Gishen
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Jun 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Jun 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Mclachlan
1 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sandy Cook
1 Aug 2016 Author responded Author comments - Faye Gishen
Resubmission - Version 4
1 Aug 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
31 Aug 2016 Author responded Author comments - Faye Gishen
Resubmission - Version 5
31 Aug 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
2 Sep 2016 Editorially accepted
22 Sep 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12909-016-0762-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement