Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A meta-analysis of the effects of non-traditional teaching methods on the critical thinking abilities of nursing students

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Dec 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bruno GuimarĂ£es
7 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel Amoako-Sakyi
11 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Somashekhar Nimbalkar
12 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lawrence Loo
15 Apr 2016 Author responded Author comments - JuHee Lee
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Apr 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lawrence Loo
11 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Somashekhar Nimbalkar
13 Jun 2016 Author responded Author comments - JuHee Lee
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Jun 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lawrence Loo
10 Aug 2016 Author responded Author comments - JuHee Lee
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Aug 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Aug 2016 Author responded Author comments - JuHee Lee
Resubmission - Version 5
30 Aug 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
2 Sep 2016 Editorially accepted
15 Sep 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12909-016-0761-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement