Table 2 Abstract Assessment Rubric
| Â | Poor 1 | Satisfactory 2 | Good 3 | Excellent 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Identifies and prioritises issues | Displays minimal awareness of the priority issues for the patient and family. | Superficially identifies the priority issues for the patient and family. | Identifies and justifies the priority issues for the patient and family. | Comprehensively identifies and justifies the priority issues for the patient and family. |
Management plan contains specific strategies to address issues | Recommends few specific strategies to address some of the issues. | Recommends specific strategies to address some of the issues. | Recommends specific strategies to address most issues. | Recommends a comprehensive range of specific strategies to address all issues. |
Includes evidence for management plan | Minimal evidence for management plan. | Some evidence for management plan. | Solid evidence for management plan. | Comprehensive and up to date evidence for management plan. |
Communication of management plan | Management plan is disjointed, poorly organized and poorly written. It appears to be stitched together from various materials. | Management plan is coherent in parts and somewhat organized. Some aspects well written. | Management plan is coherent, clear and well organized. Well written. | Management plan is highly coherent and integrated. Well written. |
Global assessment of abstract | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | Excellent |