Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Validity of a new assessment rubric for a short-answer test of clinical reasoning

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Nov 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Dec 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jacob Pearce
30 Dec 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mike Tweed
6 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Danette Waller Mckinley
6 Jun 2016 Author responded Author comments - Euson Yeung
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Jun 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Jun 2016 Author responded Author comments - Euson Yeung
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Jun 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Jul 2016 Author responded Author comments - Euson Yeung
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Jul 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
23 Jul 2016 Editorially accepted
26 Jul 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12909-016-0714-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement