Skip to main content

Table 3 Student RM encounters in each category in formal clinical training courses

From: Effects of undergraduate medical students’ individual attributes on perceptions of encounters with positive and negative role models

Encountered RMs

Students’ experience

Student attributes

Category of behaviors & attributes

Age (years)

Gender

Admission

Pos/Neg

n

Mean

SD

Male %

Bachelor %

a. Relationship with patients

P

40

26.2

4.01

62.5 %

12.5 %

P + N

62

26.4

4.66

66.1 %

6.5 %

N

11

28.0

3.80

81.8 %

36.4 %

None

2

24.5

0.71

0 %

0 %

b. Clinical expertise

P

81

26.3

3.85

67.9 %

12.3 %

P + N

22

27.2

6.20

59.1 %

4.5 %

N

5

26.6

3.64

100 %

20.0 %

None

7

25.4

3.41

28.6 %

14.3 %

c. Humanity, personal attributes

P

46

25.8

3.85

60.9 %

10.9 %

P + N

54

26.6

4.62

66.7 %

5.6 %

N

11

29.1

4.76

81.8 %

45.5 %

None

4

24.5

0.58

50.0 %

0 %

d. Lifestyle

P

59

26.4

4.16

69.5 %

15.3 %

P + N

25

26.7

5.88

68.0 %

0 %

N

11

28.2

4.05

81.8 %

36.4 %

None

20

25.2

1.99

40.0 %

0 %

e. Teaching students and health care professionals

P

49

25.9

3.98

59.2 %

12.2 %

P + N

55

26.5

4.54

67.3 %

5.5 %

N

10

28.8

4.57

80.0 %

40.0 %

None

1

24.0

 

100 %

0 %

f. Contributions to the community

P

84

26.0

3.68

63.1 %

11.9 %

P + N

18

27.6

6.72

66.7 %

5.6 %

N

4

27.5

3.51

100 %

25.0 %

None

9

27.7

4.30

66.7 %

11.1 %

  1. RM role model, SD standard deviation
  2. P: students who encountered only positive RMs; P + N: students who encountered both positive and negative RMs; N: students who encountered only negative RMs; None: students who did not encounter any RMs