Skip to main content

Table 3 Interview study participant characteristics

From: Using mixed methods evaluation to assess the feasibility of online clinical training in evidence based interventions: a case study of cognitive behavioural treatment for low back pain

Time

ID

208

289

243

258

337

197

257

226

Baseline

Age range (years)

26–35

56–65

36–45

26–35

46–55

36–45

36–45

46–55

Time in profession (years)

6

35

15

8

31

21

22

31

Preference

FP

NP

FP

FP

FP

NP

OP

FP

Method of training

iBeST

iBeST

iBeST

iBeST

iBeST

iBeST

iBeST

iBeST

Prior training in CBT

None

Yes

Yes

None

Yes

Yes

None

Yes

Post-training

Knowledgea

26

27.5

29

24.5

27

27

29.5

30

Satisfaction

S

N

S

U

VS

S

S

S

Self-efficacy: Assessmenta

9.7

8.9

4.4

5.1

5.9

6.1

4

6.5

Self-efficacy: Groupa

8

8

8.4

7

6.5

6.5

6

7.3

Change in PABS-PT: biomedical subscale b

−1

4

−8

1

6

−5

−12

0

Change in PABS-PT: psychosocial subscale a

0

4

−2

1

−5

−2

4

0

CTS-R-Pain scorea

1.79

1.93

n/a

n/a

2

n/a

2.13

1.67

  1. FP face-to-face, NP none, OP online, VS very satisfied, S satisfied, N neither, U unsatisfied, PABS-PT psychosocial attitudes and beliefs scale for physiotherapists, CTS-R-Pain cognitive therapy scale-revised-pain
  2. aAn increase in or higher score indicates an improvement on this variable
  3. bA decrease in or lower score indicates an improvement on this variable