Topic | Summary statement | Level of consensus |
---|---|---|
Necessity of PDT & PRD | PDT should be mandatory for all residents going on IME. | 100 % |
PDT should be mandatory for all residents doing electives in remote First Nations communities. | 100 % | |
PRD should be mandatory for all residents going on IME. | High | |
PRD should be mandatory for all residents doing electives in remote First Nations communities. | Mod | |
PDT and PRD should be mandatory for all residents doing electives within vulnerable populations within Canada. | No | |
PDT Delivery | Programs are encouraged to evaluate their PDT to ensure residents feel what they are learning is relevant to their experiences. | 100 % |
Individual preparatory work is appropriate, including personal research on destination and issues pertaining to resident specialty, with potential required readings and online modules. | 100 % | |
Group sessions are ideal, fostering team building and shared learning. | High | |
Fewer longer sessions are preferable to multiple short sessions to ease delivery and resident access. | High | |
Some component of PDR must be face to face (not written or online). | Mod | |
PDT Facilitation | There are benefits to multidisciplinary PDT. | High |
GH expertise is the most important characteristic of a PDT facilitator. | Mod | |
Administrative personnel can appropriately the logistics and travel safety component of PDT. | No | |
PDT Participants | If a group of learners are going to the same destination, the group can involve participants from different health disciplines (i.e. nursing, physio). | Mod |
If a group of learners are going to the same destination, the group can be trained together, even if they are at different levels of training. | No | |
PDT participants should be at a similar level of training. | No | |
PRD Delivery | A formal evaluation of the elective should be submitted to the program director and to the GH office (or similar body). | 100 % |
PRD must be delivered in a safe space where residents are free to discuss difficulties and awkward situations without being judged. | 100 % | |
Group PRD is acceptable and may be beneficial in fostering discussion around shared experiences. | 100 % | |
PRD can consist of a single or iterative sessions. | 100 % | |
Individual PRD should be available to any resident who has experienced difficulty on the elective. | High | |
Timelines are key with PRD being offered shortly after an elective. | High | |
PRD Facilitation | Facilitator should have resources available for residents who had difficult experiences. | 100 % |
Facilitator should have knowledge and experience in GH. | Mod | |
Facilitator should not be in a position to evaluate the resident. | No | |
Facilitator should not have a vested interest in the elective in question. | No | |
PRD Participants | Learners should be offered individual PRD if they perceive this to be helpful. | 100 % |
Learners who have been to the same destination can receive PRD together. | 100 % | |
Learners who have been to different destinations can receive PRD together if their experiences were similar. | Mod |