Skip to main content

Table 4 Association of use with performance on CAT

From: Medical student use of communication elements and association with patient satisfaction: a prospective observational pilot study

 

Mean (SD) # CAT questions rated at 5 (Excellent)

Student did not acknowledge patient by name (n = 96)

11.0 (3.8)

Student acknowledged patient by name (n = 150)

12.0 (3.3)

P-value

0.028 (0.034)*

Student did not introduce himself/herself by name (n = 23)

12.0 (3.1)

Student introduced himself/herself by name (n = 223)

11.5 (3.6)

P-value

0.543 (0.588)

Student did not describe his/her role as a medical student (n = 104)

11.6 (3.7)

Student described his/her role as a medical student (n = 142)

11.5 (3.4)

P-value

0.356 (0.828)

Student did not explain any steps in care plan (n = 89)

11.3 (3.4)

Student explained some steps in care plan (n = 157)

11.7 (3.6)

P-value

0.116 (0.400)

Student did not explain that other providers would see patient (n = 49)

10.5 (3.9)

Student explained that other providers would see patient (n = 147)

11.8 (3.4)

P-value

0.027 (0.012)*

Student did not provide an estimated duration of time for ED stay (n = 231)

11.5 (3.6)

Student provided an estimated duration of time for ED stay (n = 15)

13.0 (2.3)

P-value

0.041 (0.097)*

  1. *Statistical significance defined as a p-value < 0.05. The first P-value in each set is derived from Chi Square analysis. The second P-value (in parentheses) is derived from mix effects linear regression model. Values that are underline/italicized remained significant after multiple comparisons