Table 1 Three phases of collaborative analysis of video-recorded debriefings
From: Debriefing practices in interprofessional simulation with students: a sociomaterial perspective
Phase 1–3 of the analysis | Purpose | Analysis activities | Questions | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Comparison of multiple perspectives within a single video-recording | Developing collectively enriched and shared understanding of the sequence of activities | Merging individual field notes, reaching consensus on interpretations of fragments | How is debriefing of interprofessional collaboration enacted? | Focus and process for phase 2 determined |
Structural features for comparing video recordings formulated (openings, interaction, closings) | ||||
How are different professional knowings made relevant in the debriefing? | ||||
2. Comparison between different video recordings of the same scenario | Developing a shared understanding of the patterns across the data | Comparing openings, interconnections between human and non-human actors, and closings. | How is the sequence of activities in the debriefing enacted? | Transcripts of selected segments. |
Provisional relational interpretations of the patterns of debriefing as a focus for phase 3 (structure /lack of structure) | ||||
How are socio-material arrangements related to sayings and doings in the debriefing? | ||||
3. Comparison between video recordings of different scenarios | Enlarging and enriching the basis for interpretation. | Refining provisional interpretations against wider data | How is debriefing of interprofessional collaboration enacted across scenarios? | Relational patterns across all data, debriefing as algorithm or laissez faire |
Identifying variation |