Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of French training and non-training general practices: a cross-sectional study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Oct 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Dec 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Olwyn Westwood
22 Dec 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kirsty Foster
11 Feb 2016 Author responded Author comments - Laurent Letrilliart
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Feb 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kirsty Foster
17 Apr 2016 Author responded Author comments - Laurent Letrilliart
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Apr 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
21 Apr 2016 Editorially accepted
27 Apr 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12909-016-0649-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement