Skip to main content

Table 2 Descriptives (gender, age, motivation scores) and comparisons between groups using ANCOVA with age and gender as covariates

From: Motivation of medical students: selection by motivation or motivation by selection

 

Female (%)

Mean age ± SD

Strength of motivation for medical school, Meana (SE)

Autonomous Motivation, Meana (SE)

Controlled Motivation, Meana (SE)

(min. score = 15, max. score = 75)

(min. score = 7, max. score = 49)

(min. score = 5, max. score = 35)

Hypothesis 1

     

Selected students (n = 156)

71.8 %

21.33 ± 3.01

54.84 (0.66)

5.99 (0.05)

4.14 (0.07)

Non-selected students (n = 200)

70.5 %

21.01 ± 2.63

52.28 (0.58)

5.86 (0.05)

4.15 (0.06)

Test Value

  

F = 8.516**

F = 3.470 (n.s.)

F = 0.012 (n.s.)

Effect size (Cohen’s d)

  

d = 0.32

d = 0.19

d = 0.04

Hypothesis 2

     

Recently selected students (n = 90)

77.8 %

19.80 ± 2.13

56.77 (0.88)

6.12 (0.07)

4.31 (0.09)

Non-(recently) selected students (n = 183)

68.8 %

21.61 ± 2.86

52.27 (0.50)

5.85 (0.04)

4.09 (0.05)

Test Value

  

F = 19.146**

F = 11.032**

F = 4.421*

Effect size (Cohen’s d)

  

d = 0.50

d = 0.48

d = 0.44

  1. Hypothesis 1: selected students report higher strength and autonomous motivation than non-selected (lottery and top GPA) students
  2. Hypothesis 2: recently selected students report higher strength and autonomous motivation than students who were selected longer ago and non-selected (lottery and top GPA) students
  3. Effect size values of 0.2, 0.5 and 0.8 are considered small, medium and large respectively
  4. SD standard deviation; SE standard error
  5. *p < .05
  6. **p < .01
  7. aAdjusted for covariates age and gender