Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Evaluation of level 1 (reaction) of the Kirkpatrick model – comparison between modules (Post-program survey, n = 16)

From: Evaluation of an international faculty development program for developing countries in Asia: the Seoul Intensive Course for Medical Educators

Questions Module 1 Module 2 Module 3 Module 4 Module 5 Module 6 Module 7 Module 8 Spearman’s rhoc
PP 1. Overall satisfactiona 5.47 ± 0.52 -
PP 2. Most Relevant to one’s personal needsb 10 8 9 6 2 2 3 8 .890*
PP 3. Most helpfulb 6 6 6 8 7 1 5 9 0.457
PP 4. Hopes to be lengthenedb 0 2 4 4 3 6 7 15 −0.267
PP 5. Hopes to be shortenedb 2 0 1 2 4 1 2 1 −0.329
  1. *p < 0.01
  2. aOverall satisfaction with the SICME program as a whole. Rating scale: 1 (Very unsatisfied) – 6 (Very satisfied); bFellow were asked to select three or less modules per item. The number of fellows who selected the modules is shown in the cells – i.e. maximum is 16 and minimum is 0; ccorrelation to the item PM 10 (Overall satisfaction for each module)