Skip to main content

Table 3 Main aspects of the studies (n = 14) investigating perceptions of students/users on technology in physiotherapy learning and teaching

From: Online technology use in physiotherapy teaching and learning: a systematic review of effectiveness and users’ perceptions

Study credentials

Country

Design

Participants

Intervention technology used, Theme/course, Length of the intervention

Outcome measures (tool/method)

Key findings

Quality

Arroyo-Morales, 2012 [23]

Spain

RCT

46 (28f) UG, 2nd

Website; ‘Fundamentals of Physiotherapy’; 3 weeks

Perceptions on the quality of the educational environment (1–5 Likert)

Exp group scored higher on 3/10 items: ‘classes were entertaining’ , ‘I was able to learn a lot’ , ‘I was able to apply what I learned’; Con group scored higher on willingness to learn another anatomical region. Exp group reported high levels of satisfaction with the website.

83

Cantarero-Villanueva, 2012 [24]

Spain

RCT

50 (29f) UG

Website; ' Fundamentals of Physiotherapy': palpation and ultrasound; 2 modules

Students perceptions of quality of educational method (5-point Likert survey)

No differences between groups in participants’ evaluation of the quality of learning.

83

Hayward, 2004 [41]

USA

CS

57 PG,5th

Virtual learning environment: chat, discussion board; ‘Research for Physical Therapists’; 12-week course

Experiences and perceived learning (discussion board and chat room transcripts, reflective papers)

Discussion boards were deepening thinking and ability to critically examine a topic, also gave participants multiple perspectives. Technology was perceived as beneficial for improving self-directed learning strategies. Barriers included problems with access to the internet or computer, and preference for face-to-face contact.

100

Jones, 2010 [26]

Canada, Hong Kong

RCT, TG

Canada: 35, Hong, Kong:37

Video link, web-based tutorials; Two topics: oxygen transport, manual hyperinflation (cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary physiotherapy); 3 weeks

Students evaluation of learning experience

Video link group valued learning from international peers.

67

Ladyshew-sky, 2008 [42]

Australia

CS

32 UG, 4th

Blogging; Clinical placements; 15 weeks

Perceptions of learning experience and support for reflective practice

Students liked simplicity, non-threatening environment, informality, accessibility and convenience of blogging; they enjoyed learning from each other. Blogging required reflection, processing of thoughts and structuring them; let for building the trust in the group. Perceived barriers included: technical issues, too small groups, lack of example blogs.

67

Low, 2008 [30]

USA

CT

81 PG

Virtual learning environment (VLE): chat, threaded discussion, bulletin board, e-diary; clinical internship; 6 or 12 weeks

Communication with classmates and perceived effectiveness of program (survey)

VLE: let for communication, was easy to use; e-diary: beneficial source of reflection. Technology was supportive for students while off campus.

100

Maloney, 2013 [38]

Australia

CS

18 UG, 4th

Digital repository; placements; semester

Attitudes (focus groups)

Online resources convenient and useable; could support physiotherapy practice in workplace; may be an effective tool for life-long learning.

85

Moore, 2012 [37]

USA

RCT

33 DPT, 1st

Video podcasts; Basic clinical skills course: transfer and 3 weeks

Perceptions of use of both learning methods (survey with 1–5 Likert scales)

Podcasting appeared to be a reasonable alternative to in-class demonstrations for teaching basic transfer and gait training skills.

67

Peacock, 2007 [39]

UK

CS, TG

49 UG, 10 PG

Digital repository, discussion board; psychology (UG), paediatric (PG);1 semester

Perceptions, expectations, views (students, tutors focus groups and interviews)

Discussions provided peer-support and encouraged engagement with learning materials. Issues such as access, induction, IT skills need, and time requirement, have to be addressed before e-learning will offer ‘another dimension’ to lifelong learning.

100

Pittenger, 2012 [35]

USA

CS

50 DPT,2nd

Collaborative wikis; 'Rehabilitation Pharmacotherapy'; 1 semester

Previous experience with online learning (survey),

Wikis were successful in learning pharmacotherapy. Writing was helpful and difficult, complexity of the course form allowed for pharmacotherapy application in physiotherapy context.

77

perceived effectiveness and feasibility of the course form (survey, focus groups);

professional identity development (reflection assignment, focus groups)

Preston, 2012 [27]

Australia

CT Exp: online teaching additional to usual teaching, Con: usual teaching;

59 UG,2nd

Digital repository; Neurological physiotherapy; 5-weeks + revision session

Perceived usefulness of the resource (survey with VAS + comments)

Resource useful, handy, great visual tool and reminder of what was learnt in class.

100

Salbach, 2011 [43]

Canada

CS

23 PR

Personal digital assistant; Neurophysiotherapy; one off

Preferences for strategies to increase access to, implementation and application of research findings into clinical practice (in depth telephone interviews)

Advantages of PDA: quick and timely access to information, integration of information, sharing. Concerns: PDA may not be available in workplace, requirement to wear it, patient perception on technology use during a visit, high cost, training how to use it required.

83

Thomas, 2011 [40]

USA

CS

25 + 30 DPT,2st

Website; ‘Human gross anatomy’; 10 weeks

Perceptions (pre-, post-questionnaire Likert scale 1–5)

Students benefited from multimodal approach to learning.

83

Wait, 2009 [44]

USA

CS

28 DPT,1st

Audience response system (ARS); ‘Anatomy for Physical Therapists’; 16 weeks

Perceptions (Likert 1–5 + open ended questions)

ARS permitted for self-assessment and comparison of the performance with others; the immediacy of ARS feedback enhanced students' confidence to actively participate in subsequent small group discussions.

77

  1. RCT randomised controlled trial, CT clinical trial, CS case study, TG two group design, UG undergraduate programme, DPT doctor of physical therapy programme, PG postgraduate programme, PR physiotherapy professionals, f female, 2nd second year students, 3rd third year students, 4th fourth year students, 5th fifth year students, VLE virtual learning environment, PDA personal digital assistant, ARS audio response system