Exploring the association between parental rearing styles and medical students’ critical thinking disposition in China

Table 4 Stepwise model summary between critical thinking and the rearing styles of fathers & mothers

Model		R	R square	Adjusted R square	Std. error of the estimate	Change statistics
Model		R	R square	Adjusted R square	Std. error of the estimate	R square change	F change	df1	df2	P
Fathers	1	0.784^a	0.615	0.614	27.528	0.615	125.884	1	1073	0.000
	2	0.847^b	0.717	0.715	26.848	0.717	56.087	1	1072	0.000
	3	0.865^c	0.748	0.746	26.758	0.748	8.219	1	1071	0.004
	4	0.890^d	0.792	0.79	26.705	0.792	5.274	1	1070	0.022
Mothers	1	0.838^A	0.702	0.699	27.172	0.702	157.502	1	1073	0.000
	2	0.863^B	0.745	0.742	26.508	0.745	55.482	1	1072	0.000
	3	0.879^C	0.773	0.77	26.452	0.773	5.516	1	1071	0.019

^aPredictors: (Constant), Overprotection.
^bPredictors: (Constant), Overprotection, Emotional Warmth and Understanding.
^cPredictors: (Constant), Overprotection, Emotional Warmth and Understanding, Rejection.
^dPredictors: (Constant), Overprotection, Emotional Warmth and Understanding, Rejection, Over-interference.
^APredictors: (Constant), Emotional Warmth and Understanding.
^BPredictors: (Constant), Emotional Warmth and Understanding, Punishing.
^CPredictors: (Constant), Emotional Warmth and Understanding, Punishing, Rejection.

ISSN: 1472-6920