Skip to main content

Table 3 Graduates’ attitudes towards the programme, by background characteristics

From: Graduates’ satisfaction with and attitudes towards a master programme in dental public health

Characteristics

I had a strong desire to do this course

The course suited my individual needs perfectly

I worked harder on this course than on most courses

Wanted to take a course at King’s, regardless of the specialty

More positive feelings towards dental public health

The course was great value for money

Mean

(SD)

Mean

(SD)

Mean

(SD)

Mean

(SD)

Mean

(SD)

Mean

(SD)

All participants

4.17

(0.97)

3.68

(0.91)

3.88

(1.19)

2.83

(1.36)

4.24

(1.04)

3.49

(1.27)

Sex

            

  Women

4.27

(0.94)

3.59

(0.96)

3.91

(1.23)

2.68

(1.32)

4.14

(1.13)

3.23

(1.31)

  Men

4.05

(1.03)

3.79

(0.85)

3.84

(1.17)

3.00

(1.41)

4.37

(0.96)

3.79

(1.18)

   p valuea

0.513

0.673

0.840

0.466

0.453

0.110

Age group

            

  <35 years

4.18

(0.73)

3.53

(0.87)

4.00

(1.06)

3.00

(1.46)

4.35

(1.06)

3.53

(1.37)

  35-44 years

4.08

(1.04)

3.85

(0.99)

3.92

(1.32)

3.31

(1.25)

4.38

(0.87)

3.15

(1.28)

  45+ years

4.27

(1.27)

3.73

(0.90)

3.64

(1.29)

2.00

(1.00)

3.91

(1.22)

3.82

(1.08)

   p valuea

0.763

0.813

0.801

0.098

0.669

0.296

Nationality

            

  British

4.22

(1.39)

3.89

(0.93)

4.00

(1.50)

2.11

(1.45)

4.00

(1.32)

4.11

(1.05)

  South Asian

4.17

(0.86)

3.61

(0.98)

3.83

(1.34)

3.22

(1.40)

4.22

(1.11)

3.11

(1.23)

  Other

4.14

(0.86)

3.64

(0.84)

3.86

(0.77)

2.79

(1.12)

4.43

(0.76)

3.57

(1.34)

   p valuea

0.861

0.823

0.586

0.601

0.627

0.649

Time since graduation

           

  After 2010

4.33

(0.73)

3.81

(0.93)

4.14

(1.01)

3.00

(1.26)

4.38

(0.97)

3.52

(1.25)

  2000-2010

3.75

(1.04)

3.25

(0.71)

3.50

(1.31)

3.00

(1.41)

4.25

(1.04)

2.75

(1.49)

  Before 2010

4.17

(1.27)

3.75

(0.97)

3.67

(1.37)

2.42

(1.51)

4.00

(1.21)

3.92

(1.25)

   p valuea

0.802

0.960

0.867

0.273

0.956

0.456

  1. aGroups were compared in multiple linear regression models for each satisfaction score. Significance level was set to (0.05/6=) 0.008 after Bonferroni correction.