Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Graduates from a traditional medical curriculum evaluate the effectiveness of their medical curriculum through interviews

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Jun 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Katsufrakis
20 Jul 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Mclachlan
20 Aug 2009 Author responded Author comments - Simon Watmough
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Aug 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Katsufrakis
26 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Mclachlan
4 Sep 2009 Author responded Author comments - Simon Watmough
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Sep 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
5 Oct 2009 Author responded Author comments - Simon Watmough
Resubmission - Version 6
5 Oct 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
26 Oct 2009 Editorially accepted
26 Oct 2009 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-9-64

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement