Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: An assessment of functioning and non-functioning distractors in multiple-choice questions: a descriptive analysis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Feb 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Apr 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Si Mui Sim
14 Apr 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Swanson
15 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - Marie Tarrant
Resubmission - Version 2
15 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 May 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Si Mui Sim
7 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Swanson
17 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Marie Tarrant
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Jul 2009 Author responded Author comments - Marie Tarrant
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Jul 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
7 Jul 2009 Editorially accepted
7 Jul 2009 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-9-40

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement