Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Training simulated patients: evaluation of a training approach using self-assessment and peer/tutor feedback to improve performance

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Oct 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Benjamin Blatt
16 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan-Joost Rethans
13 Mar 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Perera
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Mar 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Apr 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Benjamin Blatt
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Perera
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Perera
Resubmission - Version 5
16 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
21 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Perera
Resubmission - Version 7
21 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
29 Jun 2009 Editorially accepted
29 Jun 2009 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-9-37

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement