Table 3 Frequency of respondents in five scale based on principles of sound evaluation and Standards

Propriety

P1. Service Orientation

34.6

24.8

40.6

.00

.00

P2. Appropriate Policies and Procedures

16.25

31

25.23

15.87

11.65

P3. Access to Evaluation Information

5.75

20.42

23.38

20.6

29.68

P4. Interactions with Evaluatees

7.48

19.44

29.5

22.6

20.98

P5. Balanced Evaluation

25.28

31.5

21.26

9.68

12.28

P6. Conflict of Interest

13.54

28.28

31.04

11.18

15.98

Utility

U1. Constructive Orientation

11.38

30.68

28.54

13.62

15.78

U2. Defined Uses

23.02

28.38

16.46

10.32

21.82

U3. Evaluator Qualifications

11.51

26.11

27.73

16.96

17.69

U4. Explicit Criteria

12.6

28.88

26.78

24.88

6.86

U5. Functional Reporting

13.57

27.02

29.2

12.45

17.76

U6. Professional Development

16

27.76

33.61

6.63

16

Feasibility

F2. Political Viability

24.4

28.52

19.28

10.54

17.26

F3. Fiscal Viability

9.38

28.34

24.16

12.84

25.28

Accuracy

A1. Validity Orientation

20.64

31.8

15.36

6.62

25.58

A2. Defined Expectations

12.87

30.12

28.95

17.44

10.62

A4. Documented Purposes and Procedures

5.72

19.28

26.3

19.28

29.42

A5. Defensible Information

12.28

24.24

29.02

12.2

22.26

A7. Systematic data control

6.5

17

32.5

18.9

25.1

A8. Bias Identification and Management

6.54

16.92

32.22

18.96

25.36

A10. Justified Conclusions

21.8

26.06

17.96

23.4

10.78