Skip to main content

Table 2 Ratings of different methods of teaching-learning incorporated in ILP [CNS] by the students.

From: Implementation of Integrated Learning Program in neurosciences during first year of traditional medical course: Perception of students and faculty

 

Method

Poor

Good

Excellent

No response

1

Didactic Lecture without interaction

20 [20.4%]

68 [69.4%]

4 [4.08%]

5 [5.1%]

2

Case stimulated Interactive Lectures

14 [14.3%]

78 [79.6%]

4 [4.08%]

2 [2.04%]

3

Case based Learning

40 [40.8%]

56 [57.1%]

2 [2.04%]

0

4

Student Group seminars

20 [20.4%]

61 [62.2%]

15 [15.3%]

2 [2.04%]

5

Patient exposure-Hospital visit

8 [8.16%]

58 [59.2%]

28 [28.6%]

2 [2.04%]

6

Practical Exercises in the laboratory

1 [1.02%]

63 [64.3%]

20 [20.4%]

11 [11.2%]

7

Demonstrations

19 [19.4%]

66 [67.3%]

5 [5.1%]

7 [7.14%]

  1. [N = 98/100; 98%]