Skip to main content

Table 4 Students' Feedback on COPT

From: Validating the effectiveness of Clinically Oriented Physiology Teaching (COPT) in undergraduate physiology curriculum

Items

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Uncertain

1. It motivates me to learn physiology

99 (34.38%)

175 (60.76%)

6 (2.08%)

4 (1.39%)

4 (1.39%)

2. It promotes better understanding of the subject matter

124 (43.06)

148 (51.39%)

6 (2.08%)

4 (1.39%)

3 (1.04%)

3. It helps to gain an in-depth knowledge about the subject

158 (54.86)

107 (37.15%)

4 (1.39%)

3 (1.04%)

8 (2.78%)

4. CTQ help to reduce my misconceptions about the topic

146 (50.69%)

127 (44.10%)

11 (3.82%)

3 (1.04%)

2 (0.69%)

5. CTQ stimulate my thinking

166 (57.64%)

99 (34.38%)

3 (1.04%)

4 (1.39%)

6 (2.08%)

6. CTQ improve my reasoning skills

168 (58.33%)

105 (36.46%)

4 (1.39%)

3 (1.04%)

7 (2.43%)

7. This type of teaching helps me to relate physiological principles to real life situations

151 (52.43%)

125 (43.40%)

6 (2.08%)

4 (1.39%)

2 (0.69%)

8. I feel CTQ and case studies should be included in physiology curriculum

165 (57.29%)

104 (36.11%)

6 (2.08%)

4 (1.39%)

9 (3.13%)

9. I prefer this type of teaching to didactic lectures

167 (57.99%)

96 (33.33%)

7 (2.43%)

2 (0.69%)

26 (9.03%)